b'TRITICALE2020silageperformance trials and grower directoryAreaYield Category Nutritional DataOverall Sta- MediumHigh tionYearsOverall Low 10.010.1 - 12.5 12.6CPTDNCaPKMgVariety of Testing Yield2 3 4 5 6 (t/ac) (t/ac) (t/ac) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)Varieties tested in the 2020 trials (Yield and agronomic data only directly comparable to Taza)Taza (t/ac) 10.4 10 11.4 12.3 10.6 8.5 7.1 11.3 15.3 9.1 63 0.2 0.2 1.4 0.1Taza61 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100AAC Awesome 12 100 101 102 110 100 90 97 99 123 106 102 96 99 102 117AAC Delight 12 100 95 104 89 98 100 96 103 127 112 102 92 108 83 103AAC Paramount 5 96 106 100 98 XX 88 96 XX XX 115 102 90 102 101 116AC Andrew 12 93 88 97 101 92 86 88 95 121 110 101 92 100 120 121Alderon 5 93 78 102 121 XX 81 93 XX XX 116 105 75 118 100 132Bunker 53 100 98 93 108 101 100 101 98 100 103 99 107 96 97 115Sadash 20 97 97 102 105 91- 94 93- 103 100 105 100 91 95 112 108Sunray 54 101 98 97 105 101 102 100 102 102 104 103 106 102 104 108T256 17 101 100 99 99 101 101 101 98 104 102 101 99 101 92 121Previously tested varieties AAC Chiffon 15 104 119 111 118 92 107 108 103 103 107 100 87 94 109 111AAC Innova 8 104 121 119 123 83 102 95 107 107 108 100 87 106 109 107AAC Ryley 8 97 108 104 87 87 110 86 100 101 103 100 95 106 89 117AC Ultima 7 103 104 98 120 100 XX 109 100 104 110 100 101 93 97 122Pasteur 8 94 110 96 97 84 103 91 99 91 107 103 96 99 107 117Pronghorn 21 102 107 103 114 99 101 108 99 103 103 100 102 99 109 106Tyndal 48 100 101 102 107 99 98 102 99 100 103 100 101 103 96 106Remarks: For explanations on data summarization methods and other information, please see the comments at the beginning of this publication. The yield comparison is expressed in several ways. First, overall actual yield of the standard check in t/ac along with the number of station years of testing. Second, actual yield of the standard check in each growing area. Third, average yield of each variety is expressed in per cent relative to the standard check. And finally, yield performance is also expressed on the basis of environmental productivity (Yield Test Categories of Low, Medium and High). Consistent performance over all Yield Test Categories indicates that a variety may have good yield stability over a wide range of environments. XX - Insufficient data to describe.PULSE MIXTURES2020Overall Sta- Area Yield Category Nutritional Datation YearsOverallLow 8.0 Medium8.1 -High 10.1CPTDN CaPKMgVariety of Testing Yield2 5 6 (t/ac) 10.0(t/ac) (t/ac) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)Varieties tested in the 2020 trials (Yield and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Austenson)CDC Austenson (t/ac) 8.6 5.4 9.2 8 7.3 8.8 11.8 9.9 65.2 0.3 0.2 1.6 0.2CDC Austenson 19 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100CDC Baler 19 100 99 101 104 88 113 99 98 96 109 107 124 115Taza 19 101 104 95 110 98 106 92 97 96 79 116 98 84CDC Austenson/CDC Jasper 7 89 100 94 96 83 114 97 120 97 166 114 104 123CDC Austenson/CDC Meadow 19 98 100 98 103 94 104 96 116 92 182 106 111 138CDC Austenson/Snowbird 2 86 XX XX 100 86 XX XX 173 97 125 92 111 105CDC Baler/CDC Jasper 7 85 81 89 85 XX 101 XX 151 93 167 115 133 134CDC Baler/CDC Meadow 19 96 97 99 98 81 113 93 114 96 172 114 122 136CDC Baler/Snowbird 2 81 XX XX 75 XX XX XX 95 91 116 104 130 103Taza/CDC Jasper 7 91 93 107 86 84 XX 90 155 94 152 128 108 111Taza/CDC Meadow 19 97 98 96 102 89 110 81 115 96 177 118 103 123Taza/Snowbird 2 74 XX XX 72 XX XX XX 134 89 146 132 124 129Previously tested varieties CDC Austenson/CDC Horizon 5 105 109 100 107 108 102 XX 101 97 156 102 111 133CDC Austenson/CDC LeRoy 7 88 XX 88 89 104 87 82 124 98 186 119 114 129CDC Baler/CDC Horizon 5 101 111 102 96 113 94 XX 109 94 173 101 123 145CDC Baler/CDC LeRoy 7 97 XX 97 98 75 107 90 105 96 136 108 121 111Taza/CDC Horizon 5 108 96 105 119 104 111 XX 116 96 179 106 106 137Taza/CDC LeRoy 7 96 XX 89 106 96 104 80 114 96 171 112 98 118Remarks: For explanations on data summarization methods and other information, please see the comments at the beginning of this publication. The yield comparison is expressed in several ways. First, overall actual yield of the standard check in t/ac along with the number of station years of testing. Second, actual yield of the standard check in each growing area. Third, average yield of each variety is expressed in per ceny relative to the standard check. And finally, yield performance is also expressed on the basis of environmental productivity (Yield Test Categories of Low, Medium and High). Consistent performance over all Yield Test Categories indicates that a variety may have good yield stability over a wide range of environments. XX - Insufficient data to describe.106seed.ab.ca'