b'OATS2020 silageperformance trials and grower directoryArea Yield Category Nutritional DataOverall StationOverall Low 8.0 Medium8.1 -High 10.1 CPTDN CaP K Mg Variety Years of Testing Yield2 3 4 5 6 (t/ac) 10.0 (t/ac) (t/ac)(%) (%)(%) (%) (%) (%)Varieties tested in the 2020 trials (Yield and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Baler)CDC Baler (t/ac) 10.1 8.1 9.6 14.6 11.1 7.3 5.7 9.5 13.9 9.6 61.2 0.3 0.2 1.9 0.2CDC Baler54 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100AC Juniper 44 95 98 101 85 88 103 105 81 91 101 102 96 105 102 104AC Morgan 53 100 105 100 93 97 106 102 98 98 101 102 102 113 100 98CDC Arborg 5 103 100 106 90 XX 109 99 XX 90 114 104 98 118 99 106CDC Haymaker 49 98 105 95 97 98 97 99 94 99 100 101 101 103 102 100CDC Nasser 12 99 101 109 XX 99 97 101 109 94 95 101 98 94 98 105CDC Seabiscuit 27 97 96 98 98 98 95 93 96 100 100 102 92 102 93 95CS Camden 5 94 100 102 XX XX 98 100 101 XX 106 103 113 106 108 106Murphy 48 102 108 102 94 101 102 104 104 99 94 97 98 97 102 100ORe3542M 16 97 103 96 86 96 101 98 102 96 103 105 86 113 93 95Previously tested varieties AC Mustang 39 98 99 97 95 99 99 96 99 99 101 99 99 103 101 99Derby 6 96 100 XX 106 89 94 89 93 101 89 100 98 99 100 110Everleaf 5 94 XX 113 106 72 XX 108 76 67 96 98 105 97 110 92Foothills 21 99 103 95 101 99 103 99 96 102 99 98 103 103 102 100Jordan 20 100 107 92 88 100 121 102 102 96 97 100 96 105 97 112CDC SO1 49 96 88 101 90 95 100 99 89 96 101 102 96 100 97 103Waldern 36 102 98 104 98 100 110 104 106 99 95 99 107 101 95 99Remarks: For explanations on data summarization methods and other information, please see the comments at the beginning of this publication. The yield comparison is expressed in several ways. First, overall actual yield of the standard check in t/ac along with the number of station years of testing. Second, actual yield of the standard check in each growing area. Third, average yield of each variety is expressed in per centrelative to the standard check. And finally, yield performance is also expressed on the basis of environmental productivity (Yield Test Categories of Low, Medium and High). Consistent performance over all Yield Test Categories indicates that a variety may have good yield stability over a wide range of environments. XX - Insufficient data to describe.SPRING-FALL CEREAL MIXTURES2020Area Yield Category Nutritional DataOverall StationOverall Low 8.0 Medium8.1 -High 10.1CPTDN CaPKMgVariety Years of Testing Yield3 5 (t/ac) 10.0(t/ac) (t/ac) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)Varieties tested in the 2020 trials (Yield and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Austenson)CDC Austenson (t/ac) 10.4 8.2 10.6 8.6 9.2 14.4 9.2 62 0.3 0.2 1.9 0.1CDC Austenson 4 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100CDC Baler 4 101 108 95 95 109 91 105 95 115 94 105 112Taza 4 85 82 81 43 101 94 127 101 107 168 123 110CDC Austenson/AAC Wildfire 2 110 117 103 XX 110 XX 98 96 115 86 85 89CDC Baler/AAC Wildfire 2 93 87 99 XX 93 XX 94 94 96 101 101 96Taza/AAC Wildfire 2 103 104 101 XX 103 XX 106 94 93 101 92 80CDC Austenson/Bobcat 2 114 116 113 XX 114 XX 108 98 132 95 95 118CDC Baler/Bobcat 2 103 97 108 XX 103 XX 93 95 91 97 98 105Taza/Bobcat 2 98 107 89 XX 98 XX 119 90 111 108 116 98CDC Austenson/Prima 4 101 98 100 82 107 107 110 99 119 116 97 118CDC Baler/Prima 4 88 77 97 64 94 99 101 94 98 105 111 107CDC Taza/Prima 4 97 104 85 112 91 94 114 98 91 126 100 99Previously tested varieties (Yield and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Austenson)CDC Austenson/AC Radiant 2 110 115 104 115 XX 104 111 102 91 140 104 106CDC Baler/AC Radiant 2 86 82 89 82 XX 89 116 103 98 141 113 118CDC Taza/AC Radiant 2 100 106 94 106 XX 94 112 100 69 156 94 90CDC Austenson/Metzger 2 97 106 89 106 XX 89 105 104 96 134 94 100CDC Baler/Metzger 2 89 74 105 74 XX 105 110 101 86 131 105 106Taza/Metzger 2 86 82 90 82 XX 90 119 104 78 144 96 96Remarks: For explanations on data summarization methods and other information, please see the comments at the beginning of this publication. The yield comparison is expressed in several ways. First, overall actual yield of the standard check in t/ac along with the number of station years of testing. Second, actual yield of the standard check in each growing area. Third, average yield of each variety is expressed in per cent relative to the standard check. And finally, yield performance is also expressed on the basis of environmental productivity (Yield Test Categories of Low, Medium and High). Consistent performance over all Yield Test Categories indicates that a variety may have good yield stability over a wide range of environments. XX - Insufficient data to describe.Spring 2022 105'